Skip to content
Peng Wu 吴鹏

Research

My research focuses on trustworthy AI: privacy in collaborative learning, safety and security in human-centered systems, and reliable decisions under uncertainty. Bayesian inference connects these questions across distributed learning, multi-agent systems, and mixed reality.

The question that connects my work

How can an intelligent system know what to trust—and when to reconsider?

I connect probabilistic learning with questions about the consequences of an AI system’s decisions. That means examining what information a model shares, how its confidence is justified, and what evidence supports a safety claim.

My work spans theoretical methods, experiments with distributed sensing, and models of human state. Across these settings, I aim to make uncertainty and the assumptions behind a decision explicit.

Conceptual diagram of distributed knowledge sharing among local models
01 /
Privacy · information sharing

Bayesian & federated learning

Different clients see different data. I study how Bayesian inference can model those differences, organize clients into useful groups, and combine local knowledge without overlooking dependencies between models.

In my clustered federated learning work, I formulate client–cluster association as an inference problem and develop approximations that make multiple association hypotheses tractable. Related work studies personalized jamming classifiers and communication-efficient learning across sensing devices.

These methods support collaboration without pooling raw observations. My broader privacy agenda asks what shared statistics and model updates reveal, and how explicit information protection changes personalization and uncertainty.

Bayesian inferencePersonalizationPrivacy-aware learning
A small experiment / 1 min

Find your constellation

Pair moons with similar temperatures. Find all three pairs and watch the prediction error shrink.

Close & reopen to continue.
The idea behind the game

Different clients have different data. Grouping related clients can help personalize what they learn together.

A toy analogy for client grouping, not a privacy guarantee or a reproduction of the method.

Read the research ↗
02 /
Safety · robustness & cognitive security

Human-centered AI & mixed reality

Immersive systems can affect attention, performance, and physical comfort. I develop probabilistic models of human state and methods for checking safety properties relative to a model and its evidence.

As modeling lead on a DARPA-funded project, I work on cognitive security in mixed reality, including cybersickness verification and robust engagement estimation under cognitive attack.

My ISMAR study connects system features, physiological responses, and cybersickness through a hierarchical Bayesian network. Encoding that model and specified risk properties in a probabilistic program makes it possible to check risk thresholds under observed or uncertain conditions.

This connects human-state prediction with formal probabilistic verification. The next question is how those assurances should change as users, observations, and operating conditions change.

Probabilistic verificationHuman-state modelingAdversarial robustness
A small experiment / 1 min

Mission control

Review three missions. Launch when the entire risk range is at or below 20%; otherwise take a reading or hold.

Close & reopen to continue.
The idea behind the game

A safety claim depends on both a model and the evidence. New observations can change what a system has reason to do.

Illustrative risk ranges in a fictional model. These are not real safety estimates.

Read the research ↗
03 /
Reliability · justified confidence

Multi-agent decision-making

When agents learn and act together, sharing information is only useful if they can account for what each agent already knows. I investigate posterior sharing, coordinated exploration, and decision-making under uncertainty.

My shared-prior data-fusion work analyzes what happens when local Bayesian models inherit common information. Treating those models as independent can count the same evidence repeatedly and distort the combined belief.

Our work on federated posterior sharing lets agents exchange probabilistic knowledge of an uncertain environment. It provides a foundation for studying how collaboration can improve decisions while preserving a clear account of the evidence behind them.

In my 2026 preprint on multi-robot active inference, I connect belief fusion with exploration: realized evidence increments update shared knowledge, while anticipated evidence helps robots account for teammates’ planned observations. Under the paper’s stated modeling assumptions, this addresses repeated information at fusion and redundant exploration at planning.

Posterior sharingActive inferenceCoordinated exploration
A small experiment / 2–3 min

Lost Rovers

Recover three supply pods in 12 rounds. Select a rover, tap a neighboring tile to plan its step, then move the team.

Close & reopen to continue.
The idea behind the game

Shared observations reveal more of the map. Seeing teammates’ plans helps avoid repeated exploration. Try both map modes on the same planet.

An exploration toy. The paper studies probabilistic evidence fusion and coordinated planning under explicit assumptions.

Read the research ↗
Looking ahead

Assurances that can
evolve with a system.

My long-term goal is human-centered AI that can personalize its behavior, withstand manipulation, and recognize when its assumptions no longer hold.

Formal assurance under uncertainty

Connect verification to model revision and runtime monitoring, so changes in the evidence trigger a reconsideration of the properties a system can support.

Secure, private personalization

Study attacks and legitimate user differences together, while developing explicit information protection for shared updates. User-level differential privacy is a future research direction within this agenda.

Responsible adaptation

Study how systems should adapt to people over time, when they should request more evidence, and when a decision should return to a person.

Explore the publications